Barrows armor requires 70 def, when it never used too.
Are you sure? I'm pretty sure there's always been a requirement for barrow armour.
Quote from: Jake on December 08, 2012, 06:12:06 AM
Are you sure? I'm pretty sure there's always been a requirement for barrow armour.
when i made a new account a few years back "Aliens" gave me dharocks which i could wear with 1 defence.
If so, I wasn't around for those times and I have been around for a fair while. I don't remember seeing any pures running around in Dharoks anyway. Always Dhide's 8)
Quote from: Jake on December 08, 2012, 07:14:23 AM
If so, I wasn't around for those times and I have been around for a fair while. I don't remember seeing any pures running around in Dharoks anyway. Always Dhide's 8)
True, true
I'm not saying you're wrong, for all I know you could be right. I just don't recall there never being a defence requirement for it.
Torag's was the only barrows armour that didn't require defence.
I'd also like for the degrading to be removed.
Quote from: Yoho on December 08, 2012, 07:39:55 AM
I'd also like for the degrading to be removed.
Support x1000
Stop complaining, it always had a requirement.
Quote from: Free Legend on December 08, 2012, 10:44:58 AM
Stop complaining, it always had a requirement.
You didn't needed defence for torag.
Free legend, get your facts right first. I still got an account wearing torag with 1 defence.
Ease up, No need to get aggressive.
I think it should stay the same then, if it's only 1 of the 5 armours then it would be out of place really.
Quote from: Jake on December 08, 2012, 06:21:46 PM
Ease up, No need to get aggressive.
I think it should stay the same then, if it's only 1 of the 5 armours then it would be out of place really.
All the pures complain they have no armor to wear...
Once everything is fixed there will be a wide variety of things to wear. The Pure craze has still yet to be popular again anyway :P
I mean, we can remove the defence requirement. But does it make much difference getting 70 defence? It's like 3 hits to get that.
Quote from: Kevin on December 08, 2012, 10:36:44 PM
I mean, we can remove the defence requirement. But does it make much difference getting 70 defence? It's like 3 hits to get that.
He means for pures though. There isn't enough armour that's effective at this point in time.
A pure wanting to wear barrows sounds pretty dumb to me.
Quote from: I Merk on December 09, 2012, 06:20:19 AM
A pure wanting to wear barrows sounds pretty dumb to me.
I know Right.
I also want degrading to be removed.
Well it not that silly. If they had something to wear there would be more of them.
Once a shop with Dhide is introduced I'm sure things will level out.
We could add it to the list of pure items and remove the requirements if that is what you guys want. :)
As far as degrading goes, Bob will fix your barrows items for a very cheap cost! 8)
Quote from: Ry60003333 on December 13, 2012, 12:36:12 AM
We could add it to the list of pure items and remove the requirements if that is what you guys want. :)
As far as degrading goes, Bob will fix your barrows items for a very cheap cost! 8)
That'd be great. I might start up a pure.
Why do we need degrading armour?
If someone can post all the barrows item IDs, that would be very helpful! Comma separated values are preferred. :)
Example: 1234,3456,5675
Quote from: Jake on December 13, 2012, 11:58:52 PM
Why do we need degrading armour?
It removed money from the game. ::) Plus it takes like 10 seconds to get it fixed. ;)
Quote from: Ry60003333 on December 14, 2012, 01:47:29 PM
If someone can post all the barrows item IDs, that would be very helpful! Comma separated values are preferred. :)
Example: 1234,3456,5675
Quote from: Jake on December 13, 2012, 11:58:52 PM
Why do we need degrading armour?
It removed money from the game. ::) Plus it takes like 10 seconds to get it fixed. ;)
But when someone has 1M of them does it really matter? :O
Quote from: Grievous on December 14, 2012, 02:08:31 PM
But when someone has 1M of them does it really matter? :O
Every little bit counts! 8)
Here is the item list Ryan
Dharok:
Helm:
4716 Un-noted
4717 Noted
Greataxe
4718 Un-noted
4719 Noted
PlateBody
4720 Un-noted
4721 Noted
PlateLegs
4722 Un-noted
4723 Noted
Verac:
Helm
4753 Un-Noted
4754 Noted
Flail
4755 Un-Noted
4756 Noted
Brassard
4757 Un-Noted
4758 Noted
Plateskirt
4759 Un-Noted
4760 Noted
Ahrim:
Robe Top
4712 Un-Noted
4713 Noted
Robe Bottom
4714 Un-Noted
4715 Noted
Hood
4708 Un-Noted
4709 Noted
Staff
4710 Noted
4711 Un-Noted
Karil:
Coif
4732 Un-Noted
4733 Noted
CrossBow
4734 Un-Noted
4735 Noted
Top
4736 Un-Noted
4737 Noted
Skirt
4738 Un-Noted
4739 Noted
Guthan:
Helm
4724 Un-Noted
4725 Noted
WarSpear
4726 Un-Noted
4727 Noted
PlateBody
4728 Un-Noted
4729 Noted
Chainskirt
4730 Un-Noted
4731 Noted
Torag:
Helm
4745 Un-Noted
4746 Noted
Hammers
4747 Un-Noted
4748 Noted
PlateBody
4749 Un-Noted
4750 Noted
PlateLegs
4751 Un-Noted
4752 Noted
Can you remove all the noted IDs and then format the list as one comma separated string?
Like this:
1234,4213,2313,3231
4716,4717,4718,4719,4720,4721,4722,4723,4753,4754,4755,4756,4757,4758,4759,4760,4712,4713,4714,4715,4708,4709,4710,4711,4732,4733,4734,4735,4736,4737,4738,4739,4724,4725,4726,4727,4728,4729,4730,4731,4745,4746,4747,4748,4749,4750,4751,4752
4716,4717,4718,4719,4720,4721,4722,4723,4753,4754,4755,4756,4757,4758,4759,4760,4712,4713,4714,4715,4708,4709,4710,4711,4732,4733,4734,4735,4736,4737,4738,4739,4724,4725,4726,4727,4728,4729,4730,4731,4745,4746,4747,4748,4749,4750,4751,4752
Like This?
I think he wanted the string without the Noted ID's wolfy :3.
4716,4718,4720,4722,4753,4755,4757,4759,4712,4714,4708,4711,4732,4724,4736,4738,4724,4726,4728,4730,4745,4747,4749,4752
Ps. I will double check that these are correct.
Quote from: Dug on December 25, 2012, 06:06:09 AM
I think he wanted the string without the Noted ID's wolfy :3.
4716,4718,4720,4722,4753,4755,4757,4759,4712,4714,4708,4711,4732,4724,4736,4738,4724,4726,4728,4730,4745,4747,4749,4752
Ps. I will double check that these are correct.
Ah thanks mate. i obviously didn't pay much attention to his post. Sorry about that.
Thank you! I will be sure to add these to the next update. :)