Economy Fix

[Recoil]

i think it'd be fine, just have some items that are unaffected, like rares. the raw shark number is too low. i have 10k that i fished legit, and i don't want that reduced to 300. this needs to be really well thought through on how much for each item if you're going to do it.

[Chaoslancex]

In the past few days some of the members of WorldScape has been proposing this idea, and as they asked I am making a poll on what exactly we will do.

We will not be removing every single item in WorldScape, we will be setting them back. For instance in the past there was dupes on WorldScape, which is pretty obvious. We are going to be setting the stacks of those items in each players bank down to a lower number(Not sure what number yet, you guys can debate below on which number). For example. Say I have 1,000,000 Dharok's Helm. Now obviously that is way too many for 1 person to have. So we will be setting that stack of 1,000,000 Helmets down to say 2,000. We will be doing this to every single item in the game, except a few. That is where you guys come in.

Here is a small list of items I came up with already:
Shark(385)
Pure Essence(7936)
Raw Shark(383)

Those are example items we are not going to roll-back. Now, this is where you guys come in again. We need it to be in that format "ItemName(ItemID)" in order for us to know which item we need to not roll back. If we don't agree with it, we won't do it. Now we don't need items like Bandos, Armadyl, ect. because nobody should have more then say 10-20 of those. So the roll-back will not effect those items. We are mainly looking at Wood, Ores, Raw fish, Cooked fish, tokens, ect. If you guys can get those and post them below I will add them to the list of items to not roll-back.

If you vote yes, please explain why you voted yes.
If you vote no, please explain why you voted no.

Bronze Arrow Tips(39)
iron arrows tips(40)
steel arrow tips(41)
Mith Arrow Tips ( 42)
Addy arrow tips(43)
rune arrow tips(44)


Magic logs (1513)
Raw lobster ( 377)
Silver Bar( 2355)
Uncut Dragon stone(1631)
Uncut sapphire(1623)
Uncut Emerald(1621)
Uncut Onyx (6571)
Uncut Diamond (1617)
Uncut Ruby( 1619)
Iron Ore ( 440)
Coal Ore( 453)
Mith Ore ( 447)
addy Ore ( 449)
Rune Ore (451)
Feathers ( 314)
Arrow Shaft (52)


Eye of Newt( 221)
Vial of Water( 227)
Clean avantoe (  261)
Clean torstol (269)
clean lantadyme (2481)
clean snapdragon (3000)
Clean snake weed( 1526)
Clean rogue's purse (1534)
Unf cadantine potion (107)
Unf Toadflax potion (3002)
Unf rannar potion (99)
Unf Dwarf Weed Potion (109)
Vial (229)
Unf Avantoe potion (103)


Void Knight Gloves (8842)
Void Knight Top (8839)
Void Knight robe (8840)
Void Mage helm (11663)
void seal(    ( 11666)
Void ranger helm (11664)
Void melee helm (11665)
Void Knight Mace (8841)

Fire Cape ( 6570)
Mint Cake (9475)
Onyx Necklace (6577)
Teak Planks ( 8780)
Boxing Gloves( 7673)
Black Boater (7327)
Gloves (7462)
ham hood (4302)
ham boots ( 4310)
ham cape (4304)
Sled ( 4084)
cooked Shark (385)
Cooked Manta ray (391)
Rune Shard (6466)

A Few More to come.

It seems nobody is reading Kevin's Post -.- really he said make a list of the items that should NOT be reduced or "rollback" as you can see i made a list and some items, and some should actually not be in that list cause they don't really need to be on my list anyhow to lazy to fix it, but most the the items that you post won't be rollback...

[Kryptonite]

It seems nobody is reading Kevin's Post -.- really he said make a list of the items that should NOT be reduced or "rollback" as you can see i made a list and some items should actually not be in that list cause they don't really need to be on my list anyhow to lazy to fix it, but most the the items that you post won't be rollback...

Thank you...

[spiked noob]

Tockens can be 10k

[Recoil]

Gah! I misunderstood at a first read. Didn't notice the number you put after the item was the ID. That's my bad. I honestly think the people are complaining because they want a lot of items, but I think we've gotten to the point where money and many items have no worth. I've been on and off for two years and a lot of the past rares are no longer rare due to mass duping. It will really fix the inflation I think, and everyone jumps to no because it will make it more challenging. I'm all for yes here, and I think Kevin chose some really good items on things that shouldn't be reduced.

[Recoil]

I think that Mithril seeds(299) shouldn't be rolled back.. It may seem duped when someone has 30k of them but that can be dug easily.

[drakedriller]

I personally love this idea. I know many disagree with it and it will be risky to do this but this will either make or break world scape. I would be terribly sorry to see all of the old players quit but I'm going to be straight up. The economy in this game sucks the only things that are currency in this game are donor items, sharks and pure essence. I think money should play a role and quite frankly having thousands and thousands of dharocks going down doesn't effect me at all. I would like it if they were actually more rare because then pking would actually have a purpose instead of just going and dying and the person who won gaining nothing. I know all of the old school players say they took their dear sweet time to get those items but there is just to much of it. Thanks for the consideration  .

Regards, Drakedriller.

[Recoil]

Soooo, are we getting a definite answer on what's happening? Maybe we should redo a poll, since ignorant players just made many accounts and voted no.

Just sayin'.

[Jake]

Well even if we do have another poll people will still be "Ignorant".

[Recoil]

Well even if we do have another poll people will still be "Ignorant".

True, but we were talking about a way to vote without rigging it. One vote a person. I still haven't personally found a way to do that though.

[Jake]

That's what this one was set to. Unfortunetly it doesn't have a 1 Vote per Ip option so people can make fake accounts and vote.

[Recoil]

That's what this one was set to. Unfortunetly it doesn't have a 1 Vote per Ip option so people can make fake accounts and vote.

That's what happened. Someone voted no like 10 times. Which is why I'm wondering of the result. (Hopefully redo or yes, we really need this. Don't care what others say I fully support it)

[nate]

as you can see, worldscape's population has taken a nosedive since the last time i was officially playing...  i just got on and 9 players. most of them new, which is good. great that theres new players, oh wait. we get new ones and lose the old. we need this

[richard]

by all these people who wont yes i think i should vote yes but i voted no 

[Australiaman]

I'm voting Yes because right now, Worldscape doesn't have an Economy. It's not that good of a sight. I doubt it will make anything worse because there will still be a reasonable amount of these items.